More Links >>>      Home      News/Events     About      Contact      Links      Glossary     Site Map

Wear and Corrosion Alternatives - Chrome

Technology Description of Thermal Spray & HVOF

 

 

 


Wear & Corrosion Links


Technology description of Thermal spray and HVOF

Hard chrome alternatives summary – thermal sprays  (primary alternatives in blue).

Alternative

Compliance

Usage

Notes

 

HVOF carbides

 

RoHS, WEEE, ELV, OSHA Cr*

Industrial  hydraulics, rolls, airframes and engines

Primary hard chrome alternative

HVOF alloys (e.g. Tribaloys, stainless steels)

 

RoHS, WEEE, ELV, OSHA Cr*

Hydraulic IDs, bearing journals,  airframes and engines,

Less wear resistant than carbides, but less brittle and more machinable

HVOF NiAl

RoHS, WEEE, ELV

Worn components

Relatively soft, used for thick build-up. HVOF equivalent to sulfamate Ni

Plasma and arc spray carbides and alloys

 

RoHS, WEEE, ELV, OSHA Cr*

Worn components, journals, etc, turbine engine components, hydroelectric turbines

Being replaced by HVOF for aircraft but adequate for most other industrial use. Major use in engines is thermal barriers, not Cr replacement

Cold (kinetic) spray materials

 

RoHS, WEEE, ELV, OSHA Cr

Still in development

Most only capable of spraying soft materials and alloys. Carbide sprays not commercially proven

*Note: There could be OSHA Cr PEL issues (none yet seen) with some coating materials if sprayed outside enclosed booths

The most commonly used technology for replacing hard chrome plating is thermal spray (primarily, but not exclusively, HVOF).  While this is the technology of choice for most applications it is not necessarily the best choice for all.

Technology

Thermal spray is the general term for a number of processes in which particles of coating material are heated and sprayed using high speed gas onto the surface to be coated.  It is a fully commercial industrial process that is used for coating everything from bridges and radar towers to aircraft parts and prosthetic knee joints. Since thermal spray coatings are readily sprayed up to 0.020” (500 microns) thick, they are good for rebuilding worn components, which is the primary use for hard chrome plate.

  • Of the various thermal spray technologies (click here for comparison), the most widely used are

  • HVOF for wear resistant coatings,

  • Zn and ZnAl for corrosion coating of metal structures such as communication towers and bridges, and

  • Plasma spray for thermal barrier coatings and abradables in gas turbines.

Major thermal spray processes.

Process

Coating material

Heat source

Usage

HVOF (High Velocity Oxy-Fuel)

Powder (tungsten and chrome carbide, Ni alloys)

Supersonic flame (oxy-hydrogen, natural gas-oxygen, kerosene)

Aircraft components, hydraulic actuators for mining and heavy equipment, industrial rollers – primary wear coating alternative to chrome plate. Most expensive, highest quality.  Most commonly used to replace hard chrome

Plasma spray

Powder (tungsten and chrome carbide, Ni alloys, oxides)

Intense plasma

Wear coatings, thermal barriers.  Usually not as hard and dense as HVOF but some new types of spray are comparable

Arc spray

Wire

Electric arc

Primary use is to spray Zn and Al for corrosion protection of bridges, communications towers, concrete

Flame spray

Alloy powder

Subsonic flame

Repair of some components, Zn and Al coatings for corrosion. Least expensive, lowest quality

Cold spray (kinetic spray)

Alloy powder

Hot or cold gas

High velocity spray gives particles enough velocity to form coating with little or no added heat.  In development and early marketing

Availability

There are a large number of companies around the US (most major cities have one or more companies) and elsewhere in the world who supply thermal spray services, and the equipment and supplies (thermal spray powders) are available from a number of international companies.

In the US there are at least a dozen aerospace-qualified thermal spray vendors and many who serve the industrial segment.

Use of HVOF on aircraft

HVOF WC-CoCr is taking over from hard chrome plate on most new commercial aircraft made by Boeing and Airbus.  It is now used on landing gear, hydraulic actuators, flap and slat tracks, and other wear surfaces.  In addition, airlines are increasingly using HVOF coatings to replace hard chrome in maintenance operations, both because of its better performance and faster maintenance turnaround.

  • Landing gear of Boeing 767-400

  • Landing gear of Airbus 380

  • Landing gear of Boeing 787

  • Landing gear and actuators of military aircraft such as the F-35 and X-45 UCAV.

Use of HVOF hydraulic actuators

Although hard chrome plate is still by far the most common wear coating used on hydraulics, such as those used in industrial equipment, HVOF coatings are being used increasingly by manufacturers and repair centers, partly to avoid the problems associated with chrome plating and partly for performance.

  • Heavy equipment

  • Trucks

  • Mining equipment

  • Elevators

Use of HVOF on industrial rolls

HVOF coatings are widely used on industrial rolls, especially for repair.  They can be finished to a very smooth surface that is highly wear resistant.  Rolls that are often coated include mill rolls, calendar rolls, anilox rolls, conveyer and conductor rolls.

Advantages

HVOF is a widely available technology that has been in production use for a number of years and is fully aerospace-qualified, with many commercial and OEM specifications.  In general it has a number of advantages over chrome plate:

  • No Cr6+ – Even when the spray powder contains Cr metal (WC-CoCr) or chromium carbide ceramic (Cr3C2-NiCr), the material is not in hexavalent form.  The most common chrome alternative powder used in aircraft is WC-CoCr.  The HVOF process is not known to emit Cr6+; the only place that Cr6+ is known to be formed in production thermal spray processes is in plasma spray of Cr2O3, which is used for Anilox print rolls.

  • Relatively simple industrial process – Commercially available equipment and materials.

  • Able to build up from 0.001” to >0.020” – same range as hard chrome.

  • Much better wear resistance than hard chrome – Typically 3x or more life.  Tends not to scratch or damage on assembly and disassembly.  Avoids striations and scratches on hydraulic rods.

  • Better corrosion resistance – Although it looks worse in laboratory B117 cabinet corrosion tests, it usually performs much better than hard chrome in service.

HVOF Spray gun.

 

HVOF coating of a landing gear hydraulic cylinder (courtesy Southwest United Industries).


HVOF gun

HVOF coating of a landing gear hydraulic cylinder (courtesy Southwest United Technologies). (Click on image for larger view)

 

Hard Chrome Plating

Hard Chrome Plating Alternatives

Decorative Chrome Alternatives

Cadmium plating

Chromates

Corrosion Resistant Alternatives

Chromate Alternatives

Briefings and Reports

Links

 
   

News    About     Contact     Links      Glossary    Site Map     Home

Copyright © 2006 Rowan Technology Group