Hard Chrome Plating Alternatives
- Thermal Spray
Hard chrome alternatives summary thermal sprays (primary
alternatives in blue).
|
Alternative |
Compliance |
Usage |
Notes |
|
HVOF
carbides
|
RoHS, WEEE, ELV, OSHA Cr* |
Airframes and engines, industrial rolls, hydraulics |
Primary hard chrome alternative |
|
HVOF
alloys (e.g. Tribaloys)
|
RoHS, WEEE, ELV, OSHA Cr* |
Airframes and engines, hydraulic internals |
Less wear resistant than carbides, but less brittle
and more machinable |
|
HVOF NiAl |
RoHS, WEEE, ELV |
Airframes |
Relatively soft, used for thick build-up. HVOF
equivalent to sulfamate Ni |
|
Plasma
and arc spray carbides etc
|
RoHS, WEEE, ELV, OSHA Cr* |
Primarily engine components, some IDs |
Being replaced by HVOF. Major use is thermal
barriers, not Cr replacement |
|
Cold
(kinetic) spray materials
|
RoHS, WEEE, ELV, OSHA Cr |
Still in development |
Most only capable of spraying soft materials.
Carbide sprays not commercially proven |
|
*Note: There could be
OSHA Cr PEL issues (none yet seen) with some coating
materials if sprayed outside enclosed booths |
The most commonly used technology
for replacing hard chrome plating on military hardware is
thermal spray (primarily, but not exclusively, HVOF).
Technology
Thermal spray is the general
term for a number of processes in which particles of coating
material are heated and sprayed using high speed gas onto
the surface to be coated. It is a fully commercial
industrial process that is used for coating everything from
bridges and radar towers to aircraft parts and prosthetic
knee joints. Since thermal spray coatings are readily
sprayed up to 0.020 (500 microns) thick, they are good for
rebuilding worn components, which is the primary use for
hard chrome plate.
Of the
various thermal spray technologies (click here for
comparison),
the most widely used is plasma spray for thermal barrier
coatings and abradables in turbine engines.
Availability
Most
depots have some thermal spray capability, often plasma or
flame spray for engine repair. However, the most widely
used technology for chrome replacement is High Velocity
Oxy-fuel (HVOF). HVOF capabilities are in place at several
depots
-
Ogden ALC landing gear
-
Oklahoma City ALC gas
turbine engines
-
Warner Robbins ALC
propeller hubs
-
NADEP Jacksonville
engines, landing gear
-
NADEP Cherry Point
engines, propeller hubs, helicopter components
-
Corpus Christi Army Depot
helicopter components
In
addition, Patrick AFB uses arc spray Zn-Al for corrosion
protection of ground support equipment.
Most manufacturers are now
supplying equipment that uses HVOF coatings in place of hard
chrome, and its increasing penetration in the commercial
marketplace is expected to drive its use on a broader range
of military hardware, including aircraft landing gear and
actuators, and hydraulics for vehicles and ships.
There are a large number of
companies around the US and the world who supply thermal
spray services, and the equipment and supplies (thermal
spray powders) are available from a number of international
companies.
OEM use of HVOF on
military equipment
-
F-35 CTOL landing gear (baselined)
-
F-35 hydraulic actuators
-
F-22 thrust vectoring
actuator
-
F-22 hydraulic actuators
-
C-17 main landing gear post
-
X-45 UCAV landing gear
Depot
use of HVOF in repair
-
Ogden ALC, landing gear
components (pistons, axle journals, pins, etc.)
qualified for
-
NADEP Jacksonville, engine
components for
-
Oklahoma City ALC, engine
components
-
NADEP Cherry Point
Advantages
HVOF is a
widely available technology that has been in production use
for a number of years and is fully aerospace-qualified, with
many commercial and OEM specifications. In general it has a
number of advantages over chrome plate:
-
No Cr6+ The
most common chrome alternative powder used in DoD is
WC-Co, which contains no Cr. Even when the spray powder
contains Cr metal (WC-CoCr) or chromium carbide ceramic
(Cr3C2-NiCr), the material is not
in hexavalent form. The HVOF process is not known to
emit Cr6+; the only place that Cr6+
is known to be formed in production thermal spray
processes is in plasma spray of Cr2O3,
which is used for Anilox print rolls.
-
Relatively simple
industrial process Commercially available equipment
and materials.
-
Able to build up from
0.001 to >0.020 same range as hard chrome.
-
Much better wear resistance
than hard chrome Typically 3 or more times life.
Tends not to scratch or damage on assembly and
disassembly. Avoids striations and scratches on
hydraulic rods.
-
Better corrosion resistance
Although it looks worse in B117 cabinet corrosion
tests, it usually performs much better than hard chrome
in service.
-
No hydrogen embrittlement
-
Faster turnaround time -
Turnaround is reduced to hours instead of days because
of faster processing and no need for embrittlement
relief.
-
Cost - Process cost is
usually 1.5-2x higher than hard chrome. Life cycle cost
is usually much lower that hard chrome because of
improved performance.
Limitations of
HVOF for DoD applications
The only
serious way in which HVOF falls short of hard chrome
performance is in its response to high load and high cycle
fatigue. Because the strain-to-failure of most HVOF carbide
coatings is only about 0.7%, it will crack above this
strain. The cracks do not run into the underlying material,
but they can run along the interface and cause pieces of
coating to spall off.
High
load: Under high
cyclic load HVOF coatings can spall, with the coating coming
off in large flakes from test specimens. (Note: this has
been seen in fatigue testing but not in service.) This
behavior is typically seen in high strength steels (300M,
4340) at loads above about 180ksi in tensile loading, or
20-40ksi higher in bending. Thin coatings are less
susceptible (in fact 0.003 (75mm)
coatings show no spalling, but coatings tend to spall at
lower loads as the thickness increases. This is not a
problem for most applications of HVOF, since loads are
generally well below this value, even for landing gear.
However, it has led to a great deal of concern for its use
on the landing gear of carrier-based aircraft, which see
high reversed loads on launch and landing. It has not been
found to be an issue for Air Force landing gear cylinders,
journals or pins, or for hydraulics, engines, or other
components.
High
cycles: After high
cyclic loading at low load the coating usually shows signs
of cracking in a circumferential pattern around landing gear
cylinders. This cracking pattern can be seen in landing
gear that have been in service for several years, but, like
the well-known cracking pattern seen in chrome plate, it
does not appear to affect sealing or corrosion in service.

HVOF spray gun.

HVOF coating of a landing
gear hydraulic cylinder (courtesy Jon Devereaux, NADEP JAX)
Major thermal spray processes.
|
Process |
Coating material |
Heat source |
Usage |
|
HVOF (High Velocity Oxy-Fuel) |
Powder (tungsten and chrome carbide, Ni alloys) |
Supersonic flame (oxy-hydrogen, natural gas-oxygen,
kerosene) |
Aircraft components, hydraulic actuators for mining
and heavy equipment, industrial rollers primary
wear coating alternative to chrome plate. Most
expensive, highest quality. Most commonly used to
replace hard chrome |
|
Plasma spray |
Powder (tungsten and chrome carbide, Ni alloys,
oxides) |
Intense plasma |
Wear coatings, thermal barriers. Usually not as
hard and dense as HVOF but some new types of spray
are comparable |
|
Arc spray |
Wire |
Electric arc |
Primary use is to spray Zn and Al for corrosion
protection of bridges, communications towers,
concrete, but some new cored wires are available for
wear alloys |
|
Flame spray |
Alloy powder |
Subsonic flame |
Repair of some components, Zn and Al coatings for
corrosion. Least expensive, lowest quality |
|
Cold spray (kinetic spray) |
Alloy powder |
Hot or cold gas |
High velocity spray gives particles enough velocity
to form coating with little or no added heat. In
development and early marketing. Most cold spray
methods cannot spray wear materials |
|